I usually attempt to stay away from heated political
conversation. Not really because I am the type who has little to no opinion
(quite the opposite). But, because I have realized from my study of conflict
how interesting it is that people so easily believe what they hear or read
(news, articles, professors, textbooks, google) and take it as fact (if it
supports their previous opinion). And then exert unnecessary energy arguing to
defend that position. But, when you unpack the information that you see on the
news, read in articles, hear professors or other experts share, the truth is
that majority of the time you are believing someone else’s opinion or theory
which may or may not be true. You are choosing a conglomeration of narratives (some
being culturally chosen for you) and letting those narratives make up your
worldview. Think about it for a moment, why do Americans see pancakes, bacon
and eggs as breakfast food? Why is it that when restaurants in America say: “breakfast
served all day” we immediately assume that those items will be available? Why
can’t it be beans and rice served as breakfast food? Or lasagna? Or meatloaf
and mashed potatoes? Has it been scientifically proven that pancakes and eggs
can only be considered breakfast food? Here is my point: pancakes and bacon are
only breakfast food because our culture has deemed them so. There is no truth
behind it. There are no facts or studies involved proving that it is the
superior breakfast food. Someone at some point decided that they liked eating
it in the morning and a new cultural narrative was born. We are surrounded by
narratives that constitute our “truth” or “facts” without even knowing it. Here
are some other examples: shaking hands when making a new acquaintance; raising
your hand in school; a man opening a door for a woman; wearing a suit and tie
to work as proper dress code…the list could go on. All of these are cultural
narratives that we have deemed right and proper and when someone does not abide
by these narratives they are viewed as rude or improper. Now let’s take that to
the next step and discuss politics. There are two (or three, or four, or one
hundred) worldviews on what it means to be a democracy and on how to run our
country. All of these are derived from groups of individuals with opinions.
Some have done studies (which as someone who has done multiple research studies
knows – it is impossible to do an unbiased study). Some have read books and
articles (written by other people with their own biased opinions). Some others
have witnessed events (through the lens of their own perspective and opinions).
And yet, we take these people’s words as truth, many of them strangers to us
and argue against family members, neighbors, and schoolmates, ourselves
convinced that they are wrong when they are simply listening to different
narratives than the ones we are. My point? Conflict is contagious, and before
you engage in it ask yourself this question: What is truth?
Thursday, November 26, 2015
Friday, November 20, 2015
What Are You Willing to Sacrifice for Peace
It was
the first day of my first class in Conflict Analysis and Resolution. The air
buzzed with enthusiasm as we were introduced to each other and introduced to
some of the theories and practices that would be our companions for the next
couple of years. I was surrounded by do-gooders, like myself, who desired to
make a positive impact on the world. Before us stood a professor, who had
already left his mark on the conflict resolution community and had turned to
teaching to motivate the next generation of practitioners. Towards the end of
the class this professor stood before us, with tears in his eyes, and asked us
this question: "what are you willing to sacrifice for peace?" He began
to tell a story of a Dutch man named Dirk Willems who had been condemned by the
Catholic Church and arrested for following the Anabaptist church. Dirk had
eventually escaped from prison by tying fabric together to make a rope and then
using it to climb out of his prison window. As he was running across a frozen
moat to his freedom, he saw the guard that had been pursuing him fall through
the ice. Instead of continuing on, he turned around and saved the drowning man
from death. As a result of this act, he was taken back to prison where he
remained until 1569 when he was burned at the stake. He had sacrificed his
freedom to rescue one of his captors. When the professor had finished relaying
this story the once boisterous room had turned silent. Our professor, choked
with emotion, emphasizing each syllable asked: "What are YOU willing to
sacrifice for peace?"
Years
have passed since that time but I have never forgotten that moment. It is a
question that has replayed over and over in my mind. I have not fully decided
to what extent I am willing to sacrifice for peace. But I know that I can give
my time. And I can give my voice.
I want to
devote this blog to be a place where crucial conversations can occur. I want
to talk about things that are hard to talk about because they are painful or
controversial. I want to carve out a space where every side of an issue can be
shared without political agendas or personal gains. I do not want this blog to
be a place to air grievances or share contentious deeply held opinions. This is
meant to be a safe space, free of judgment or shame, where the purpose is to
think through what needs to happen to resolve the conflicts that we are
witnessing in the world around us. And hopefully as these topics emerge and
take shape more people will be led consider that poignant question asked of me
years ago: "what are you willing to sacrifice for peace?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)